Sunday, September 27, 2009

Of Borders & Brands

After yesterday’s National Wild Horse & Burro Adoption Day affording the opportunity for so many of our mustangs and burros to be loaded up to head out across the country to their new homes - as well as concerns about BLMs new trial program being exclusively conducted in the slaughterbelt hubs of Texas, New Mexico, Oklahoma and Kansas billed as, “$500 Wild Horse Adoption Incentive Program”, which gives our wild ones away for free then cuts the new owners a $500.00 check after one year (with compliance checks historically being as low as 5% nationally) – understanding BLM’s branding system may be an important tool in helping the public to protect America’s mustangs and burros.

Posted below are a variety of photos taken from BLMs holding facilities to help illustrate the different kinds of brands BLM uses to identify wild horses, because as it turns out, it’s not just a simple freezebrand mark on the neck anymore. There are different brands that identify “For Sale” horses, Long-Term Holding Horses, Fertility Control Mares being held at facilities that may or may not be returned to the range at a later date (?) and with the new slew of BLM management proposals recently approving adding geldings to the free-roaming herds – with new brands for those as well – advocates need to begin to understand what they are looking at.

In addition to the photos, a variety of advocates have been posing questions to BLM officials regarding “what” these brands mean. Posted below the photos are various answers received from officials. Apparently, BLM personnel needs to get on the same page and understand what they are looking at as well as some of these responses presented contradictory information. Now all we have to do is figure out which one is telling the truth!

This post is designed to be a work in progress. If you have additional brand photos you would like to add, please contact Valerie James Patton at valerie_jamespatton@yahoo.com.

American Herds would also like to encourage everyone to add your own stories or experiences regarding BLM brands, adoptions, sales, etc. in the comment section in order to help advocates have a working database of what is going in the BLM National Wild Horse & Burro Program.

































-Official BLM Feedback on Brands-

How it began….

After receiving many of the above photos, Wild Horse & Burro and anti-slaughter advocate Valerie James Patton began inquiring as to the nature of these brands. On Thursday, September 24, 2009, she contacted Timothy Green of Nevada’s Palomino Valley Holding Facility by phone to question Mr. Green regarding the meaning of these brands. Based on his responses, she sent out the following information later that day with a request to cross-post widely.

From: Valerie James Patton
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 1:16 PM

I've attached 5 pictures that were taken September 6th, 2009. 4 of these pictures are from Snow's BLM facility, and 1 was taken at the Palomino Valley BLM facility. The picture of the brand # 5634 was taken at Palomino Valley, and all others were taken at Snow's.

Some of the brands on these horses are very unusual, and while I've known that the 4 digit rump brands are for horses destined for long term holding facilities given to horses that are considered unadoptable, I've never seen horses branded with the AB before. Some of these horses are branded only with the AB, some are branded with AB and the 4 digits, and some are the 4 digits only. The 4 digit rump brands match the last 4 digits of the freeze brand on the neck.

I called Snow's facility yesterday, and the woman who called me back this morning, stated she had no idea what the brands were, but these were brands BLM is using on the horses.

I contacted Palomino Valley just a while ago, and spoke to the person in charge of brands, Timothy Green, and he said that the AB is branded on mares that have been injected with PZP. Some that do not have the 4 digits are returned to the range, and others that have the AB and the 4 digits, were mares that had been previously gathered and injected with PZP, returned to the range, then regathered and branded with the 4 digits to show that they were now sale authority or horses headed to long term holding.

He said that horses between 5 & 10 years old, were sale authority horses, and any horse past the age of 10 were intended for long term holding, and would not be available for sale or adoption.I asked him about the extended U on the neck brand, which used to be the sale authority brand, and he wasn't aware of the brand. I have seen pictures of the brand, and I have a letter from Dean Bolstad of BLM, that states the U is branded on sale authority horses only.

I was also previously told that the 4 digit rump brand was not branded on sale authority horses, but only branded on horses intended for long term holding that would not ever be for sale or adoption, but according to Mr. Green, BLM changes the way they do the branding often, and this must have been one of the changes.

There's been quite a bit of concern about horses leaving the long term facilities for slaughter, and knowing what these brands look like will help track them.

I sent a couple of these pictures to a few people the other day, and one person who attends both auctions and feedlots, has written back and said they have seen horses with the AB before, but couldn't remember where.

I do have several more of these pictures, and they will be up on the American Herds blogspot in the next couple of days, along with any more information about the brands that I can find out about. If anyone else would like to see more of these pictures, let me know.

So I'm sending these pictures out to everyone because I doubt that if anyone was to see these brands on these horses, they would be able to recognize that these were BLM horses. I hope that rescues and anyone that attends auctions, feedlots, or sees horses in the export pens along the borders will be able to recognize that these are BLM horses, so please crosspost this information and those of you with websites, please post these pictures to help get the word out.

Thank you!
Valerie
**********************************************************************************

In response to Ms. Pattons request to cross-post this information, other advocates sent additional requests for information to various BLM officials about these brands as well.


1. From BLMs National Public Affairs Specialist Tom Gorey

This was the reply received from BLMs Public Affairs Specialist Tom Gorey on Friday, September 25, 2009. BLMs official responses are posted in capitol letters and highlighted in bold.

I've attached 5 pictures that were taken September 6th, 2009. 4 of these pictures are from Snow's BLM facility, and 1 was taken at the Palomino Valley BLM facility. The picture of the brand # 5634 was taken at Palomino Valley, and all others were taken at Snow's.

Some of the brands on these horses are very unusual, and while I've known that the 4 digit rump brands are for horses destined for long term holding [YES] facilities given to horses that are considered unadoptable, I've never seen horses branded with the AB before. Some of these horses are branded only with the AB, some are branded with AB and the 4 digits, and some are the 4 digits only. The 4 digit rump brands match the last 4 digits of the freeze brand on the neck.

I called Snow's facility yesterday, and the woman who called me back this morning, stated she had no idea what the brands were, but these were brands BLM is using on the horses.

I contacted Palomino Valley just a while ago, and spoke to the person in charge of brands, Timothy Green, and he said that the AB is branded on mares that have been injected with PZP. [TRUE] Some that do not have the 4 digits are returned to the range, and others that have the AB and the 4 digits, were mares that had been previously gathered and injected with PZP, returned to the range, then regathered and branded with the 4 digits to show that they were now sale authority [NO] or horses headed to long term holding. [YES, HEADED TO LONG-TERM HOLDING]

He said that horses between 5 & 10 years old, were sale authority horses [NO, ONLY THOSE OVER 10 AND THOSE PASSED OVER FOR ADOPTION AT LEAST THREE TIMES], and any horse past the age of 10 were intended for long term holding, and would not be available for sale or adoption. [NO, THEY ARE AVAILABLE FOR SALE OR ADOPTION]

I asked him about the extended U on the neck brand, which used to be the sale authority brand, (Embedded image moved to file: pic12292.jpg) [THE BIG U IS THE ONLY BRAND THAT DESIGNATES SALE AUTHORITY] and he wasn't aware of the brand. I have seen pictures of the brand, and I have a letter from Dean Bolstad of BLM, that states the U is branded on sale authority horses only.

I was also previously told that the 4 digit rump brand was not branded on sale authority horses, [NO, THEY CAN BE BOTH SALE AUTHORITY AND LONG-TERM HOLDING] but only branded on horses intended for long term holding that would not ever be for sale or adoption, but according to Mr. Green, BLM changes the way they do the branding often, and this must have been one of the changes.

There's been quite a bit of concern about horses leaving the long term facilities for slaughter, [A CONSPIRACY THEORY THAT IS FALSE] and knowing what these brands look like will help track them.

I sent a couple of these pictures to a few people the other day, and one person who attends both auctions and feedlots, has written back and said they have seen horses with the AB before, but couldn't remember where.

I do have several more of these pictures, and they will be up on the American Herds blogspot in the next couple of days, along with any more information about the brands that I can find out about. If anyone else would like to see more of these pictures, let me know.

So I'm sending these pictures out to everyone because I doubt that if anyone was to see these brands on these horses, they would be able to recognize that these were BLM horses. I hope that rescues and anyone that attends auctions, feedlots, or sees horses in the export pens along the borders will be able to recognize that these are BLM horses, so please crosspost this information and those of you with websites, please post these pictures to help get the word out.


2. From Palomino Valley Brand Manager Timothy Green
Second Response

On Friday, September 25, 2009, the day after talking with Ms. Patton, Timothy Green contacted her by phone to apologize and correct some of the information he had given to her the day before. Pasted below is his email reply in its entirety.

From: Timothy Green timothy_green@blm.gov
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 2:22 p.m.

When the mustangs are gathered they are usually put into three different categories.

The first category is adoptable which is mare with foal, weaners, yearlings, and 2 to 4 year old horses. Their freezemark is a "U" followed by 8 marks that indicate their age (first 2 marks), series (second two marks) and the horse number (the last four marks) which are the actualnumber or tag number for the horse.

The second category is the 5 to 10 year old horses which are marked with the freezemark on the neck and a 4 digit number on the left hip. These horses may or may not have a large U on the hip.

The third category is the 11 years and older which has the regular freezemark on the neck and a large U fright after it. It would look something like this - regular size u followed by eight symbols and that followed by a big U.The hip mark indicates that the horse is 5 or older and when this is followed by a large U it is identified as being a sale authority horse (11 and older).

There are always exceptions to this and the one that stands out is in the 5 to 10 year olds that, even going to a long term holding facility, may be adoptable so they will be given just the standard neck brand.

You may also see some mares that have a a large AB on their hip. This is to identify the mare as having been injected with PZP for birth control. These mares may have been captured in 2001, given PZP and then released back to the herd. When a new gather is done at a later date 2009, thissame mare may be gathered again, only this time she will be brought into the facility for processing.

I hope that I have explained the freezemarks better that over the phone,

If not please let me know.

Thank you for your patience,
Timothy Green Contact Representative/Adoption Clerk
National Wild Horse and Burro Center Palomino Valley
office (775)475-2222
fax (775)475-2053


3. From Utah Wild Horse & Burro Lead Gus Warr

From: Gus War Gus_Warr@blm.gov
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 11:15 a.m.

You just caught me before I head out the door for the National Adoption day tomorrow. We have 4 events going on here in Utah and will hopefully find good homes for as many animals as possible.

Here is a summary of the brand (or freezemark) confusion:

Each animal that is removed from public land is given an "alpha angle freezemark" that consists of the "U" and 8 angles. This is the mark that most folks are familiar with. All animals adopted or sold have this freezemark.

Any "Sale" animals have a "U" (when I say, "U" - this is actually a square u with two bars off the side. It's a government registered mark that is nationally in all state brand books) near the freeze mark. Below is some specific information on this.

All new sale eligible animals removed from the range will be marked with the standard alpha angle animal identification freeze mark applied to the left side of the neck.

In addition to the standard identification freeze mark, all sale eligible animals will be freezemarked with a 3-inch (Embedded image moved to file: pic25721.jpg) symbol on the left side of the neck to distinguish between animals that are sold and those adopted. The new mark should be placed immediately to the right, adjacent to and on the same level as the identification freezemark.

This may not be possible in a few situations and alternative placement locations inorder of preference are first, below the identification freeze mark and second above.Four digit hip numbers will not be applied to sale eligible animals unless they are going to be shipped to long-term holding.

The fertility control mares in the photos are usually not removed from the range. However, "unforeseen circumstances" may warrant their removal (ie: wildfire, lack of available forage or water, etc.).

The below paragraph is our current policy.

Wild horse mares treated with PZP will be maintained in their Herd Management Area (HMA) a minimum of three-years following treatment.

In the vast majority of cases, the released mares will never be gathered sooner than the mandatory three-year holding period.

In those rare instances when, due to unforeseen circumstances, a treated mare(s) is removed, they will be maintained either in a BLM facility or contracted Long Term Holding Facility until expiration of the three-year holding period.

All treated mares in population-based treatments will be freeze-marked on the hip for identification purposes.

A two-letter freeze mark assigned by NPO will be applied to the left hip of each treated mare in Population Based Trials.

The two letters represent -- the first letter is the year of the fertility control trial (ie: A), and the second letter is the trial area (ie: B); thus you have an AB on the hip. Our National program office keep the data on these assignment of which two digit lettering is applied at what locations.

Hope this helps!

Thanks~
gus
Wild Horse & Burro Specialist
Utah Program Lead
BLM-Utah State Office (UT-933)
440 W. 200 S., Suite 500
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101-1345
[Mail: P.O. Box 45155, Salt Lake City, Utah 84145-0155]


-Additional Responses & Information from BLM Officials Include-


4. From National WH&B Lead Dean Bolstad
BLMs responses are in italics.

From: Dean Bolstad Dean_Bolstad@blm.gov
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 7:49 a.m.

See the following answers to your questions.

1. WHY are 2 year olds setting in long term holding facilities?

The horses in the internet adoption picture that you called my attention to were born at a Long Term Holding facility as a result of pregnant mares that were placed in long term holding after capture.These horses in the picture were born during the spring of 2006, removed from the long term holding facility for weaning during the fall of 2006, and placed in short term holding where they have been waiting adoption. They are currently about 21 months old.

2. Why were they taken OUT of long term holding facilities? Has there been a sufficient amount of adoptions that BLM can start bringing long-term horses out and offer them another chance?

They were removed from long term holding as weanlings at about 7 months of age for two reasons. 1) The stud colts can not be allowed to stay with the mares as they would begin to breed if they weren't removed. 2) Weanlings are the most adoptable age group of horses.

3. It also got me wondering.....how does BLM distinguish a long term horse or burro from any other? Do you do a different signature on the freezebrands? It is my understanding that some horses are immediately identified to be shipped to long term holding facilities (age obviously the key factor). This is correct, yes? Does BLM mark them right there during processing for long term holding after the gathers? What/how do they do it? Does BLM have a way of identifying what a "For Sale" horse is that is different from others and if so, what is it?

Most horses five and older are shipped to long term holding because there is little adoption demand. Depending on available space at short term holding corrals, some three and four year olds have been shipped to long term holding. The BLM marks almost all horses bound for long term holding with a four number left hip mark that correlates with the last four numbers of the animal's freezemark. Some three and four year olds shipped to long term holding have not been hip marked because we thought there might be an opportunity to adopt them. About ten, two year olds have been sent to long term holding that have deformities that are not life threatening, but that render them unappealing to most adopters.We have not sent any burros to long term holding.All sale eligible horses that are 11 years old and older are marked with a three inch "U" freezemark immediately to the right of their traditional BLM freezemark.

I hope this answers your questions.

Sincerely,
Dean Bolstad
Wild Horse/Burro Operations Lead
Reno National Program Office (Washington Office)
(775) 861-6611


5. From California WH&B Lead Amy Dumas
This following email exhange has only been copied for its relevant portions regarding the subject of brands, sanctuary’s and horses being sold.


From: Amy Dumas Amy_Dumas@ca.blm.gov
Sent: 7/16/08 9:31:55 AM

Thank you for your inquiry. All horses that are sent to long term holding are freezebranded on their hip with their last four identification numbers. It allows them to be identified from a distance. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me.


From: PRIVATE
Sent: 7/16/08 2:15 PM

Thank you so much for your answer Amy.

I was under the impression that a long term holding facility meant that the horse could not be sold, am I wrong?

I only have part of the paperwork on this horse who's ID number is 95213955 but at the top of her paperwork is a number that is hand written, it is 5581 but the number 5578 is marked out, could this mean she had a foal also?

Much of her paperwork is missing or lost but in research I know she came from CA and was sent to KS, then sold. How can I find out who she was sold to or where this person was from and if she had a foal if the foal was sold with her? I need to understand her history in order to figure out how to bond with her in the best way for her.

Any help you can provide is appreciated.


From: Amy Dumas Amy_Dumas@ca.blm.gov
Sent: 7/17/2008 9:22:48 AM

This mare was gathered in July 2001 from the Twin Peaks HMA in northeastern California. After being prepared, she was shipped to a sanctuary location and then sold 4 years later. Horses can be sold from sanctuary, but it does not occur frequently, and it usually has to be at least 30 animals.

Regarding the numbers on top of the page, I am not sure what those mean. It could have meant she had a foal, but the foal would have been weaned prior to her shipping to sanctuary. I am guessing someone's notes on other horses of interest or someone at the facility matching her with a foal. But again, they would have waited to ship her until the foal was weaned.

Under the provisions of the Privacy Act, I am not permitted to tell you who purchased her. If you have any other questions, let me know.

Amy Dumas Program Manager,
Wild Horse and Burro Bureau of Land Management
2800 Cottage Way
Sacramento, CA 95825
916-978-4678 office
916-978-4657 fax

Monday, September 21, 2009

Senator Feinstein: A Woman of Her Word?

Photo courtesy of Wild Horse Spirit, Ltd.

Despite the long list of undisputed and well-worn complaints regarding BLMs management of the Wild Horse and Burro Program, last week BLM scheduled the removal of a handful of wild burros at Owl Hole Springs with more round ups scheduled this week for a few isolated now “zeroed out” burros still clinging to their free-roaming lives within the Panamint, Slate and Centennial Herd Areas in California.

On August 19th, at the legally required public hearing held in Barstow, CA regarding BLMs plans to remove these burros, it was suggested the only hope they now had was through contacting California Senator Feinstein and urging her to intercede on the burros behalf.

As a result, volunteer for California based Wild Burro Rescue Linda Lee has been in contact with Chris Carrillo of Senator Feinstein Los Angeles office this past month in efforts to urge Feinstein to finally take action.

According to Ms. Lee, “As the author of the California Desert Protection Act, Senator Feinstein stated in her 2005 letter to then DOI Secretary Gale Norton that she strongly believed wild burros were a part of the heritage of the Mojave Desert - having been present in this area since CA's Gold Rush. Senator Feinstein went on to say that she opposed any efforts to remove these wild burros from their legal Herd Areas and that she wanted to be immediately informed of any removal plans".

"California citizens are asking Senator Feinstein to live up to the words stated in her 2005 letter and put an immediate stop to the BLM's roundups of California's last remaining heritage herds.”


In response, I submitted the following letter to Senator Feinstein’s office today urging her immediate intercession in this matter. In order to help raise public awareness of the critical conditions facing California’s now forgotten wild burro herds, I am reprinting it here.

There is also contact information for Senator Feinstein and Senator Boxer listed at the bottom of this post if you would like to add your own voice to the growing demand for our representatives to begin stepping up to the plate by honoring both law and intent of the Wild Free-Roaming Horse and Burro Act before it's too late!

*******************************************************************************

Dear Senator Feinstein:

As a life long resident of both California and Nevada who has watched our wild burro herds disappear, I am writing today to implore you to begin honoring promises made to the American people given through the Wild Free-Roaming Horse and Burro Act - as well as the promise given by yourself four long years ago - regarding your support for protecting and preserving California’s historic wild burros herds.

Wild burros were once considered an icon of the American West with California taking the lead by declaring them “California’s Mascot”, as it was once home to the largest wild burro population in the country. Even prior to the passage of the 1971 Act, California had initiated state protections for wild burros through California Fish & Game Code 4600, which still stands today.

At the time of passage of the California Desert Conservation Area Plan (1980), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) acknowledged there were 19 recognized Herd Management Areas that could be managed for wild burros within “the natural thriving ecological balance” and 14 were officially designated for that purpose within the Conservation Area alone. The combined BLM approved “appropriate management levels” totaled 2,747 wild burros with their available habitat totaling approximately 3,500,00 million acres.

Today, this same area has less than 300,000 acres of habitat remaining and only 229 or less wild burros are now considered “appropriate” – a 90% reduction in both habitat and populations - despite their supposed federal and state protected status.

Throughout the entire state of California, there are now only 3 remaining wild burro herds, none of which are being managed for genetically viable populations. The entire combined “allowed” population issued by BLM for all wild burros in the State of California is merely 345 animals (this number accounts for the fact that BLM is currently padding California’s AML by adding populations into their “allowed” numbers that no longer exist due to removals) with over three million acres of habitat now completely eliminated, or seventy-five percent of their former ranges now gone.

And the round ups continue….

On this clear and present course for “managed extinction”, how much lower do wild burro populations and their home ranges have to be gutted before someone begins to honor both law and the promises made to the American people to insure their protection and preservation?

Right now, the BLM is planning on conducting removals yet again to sweep tiny handfuls of isolated burro herds from lands once dedicated for the purpose of including them within the natural system of public lands.

Yet, as can be seen from California’s abysmal statistics, no amount of public involvement has been successful in halting the BLM and various agencies in their conspiracies and achievement of decimating the largest wild burro population in the nation – these precious heritage herds now lost to us forever.

And so, with the public having no reasonable recourse left, as all our pleas for either justice or mercy continue to fall on deaf ears, I turn to you in desperate hopes that you will honor your former commitment and keep your word to protect and preserve California’s remaining burros by acting as true representative of both people and law.

PLEASE PICK UP THE PHONE NOW AND CALL BLM TO DEMAND AN IMMEDIATE HALT ON ANY FURTHER ROUND UPS OF CALIFORNIA’S WILD BURROS!
Contact: California BLM Chief Resource Manager
Tom Pogacnik (916) 978-4637

It is their last hope and chance.


As BLM continues, unabated, to implement the same strategic management plans of almost 40 years aimed at circumventing lawful protection of both herds and habitat alike, please show your support for reversing this long standing trend by becoming a co-sponsor of Senate Bill S. 1579; renew your commitment for both the protection and preservation of these, America’s historically distinct free-roaming herds

Thank you for your time and immediate attention to this matter.



Senator Dianne Feinstein
331 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Phone: 202-224-3841
Fax: 202-228-3954
Email Here


Senator Barbara Boxer
112 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington D.C. 20510
Phone: 202-224-3553
Fax: 202-224-0454
Email Here

Friday, September 11, 2009

In The News

Well, now that BLM has received ample funding by Congress to “keep on keeping on” with no questions asked, the only way to cover the explosion of activities this funding is being used for is to provide a quick summary of everything going on. So, without further ado…


BLM National Wild Horse & Burro Advisory Board
The BLM National WH&B Advisory Board has been set for Monday, September 28, 2009 in Arlington, Virginia. Public comments will be accepted until September 23, 2009. Click Here to learn more.

Nevada Newsmakers
Watch current National Wild Horse & Burro Advisory Board members use their positions to misrepresent facts in order to promote their own special interests. See “Doctor” Boyd Spratling, currently BLM’s chosen representative for Veterinary Medicine, describe “some” livestock grazing in wild horse territory (Dr. Spratling is also the ex-President of Nevada’s Cattleman’s Association) and Representative for Wildlife, Larry Johnson, (ex-President of Nevada Bighorn Unlimited and still serving on the Board of Directors for NBU), "spin the numbers" (where did he get this information from?) as well as promoting alternatives to dispose of “excess” animals, such as their unlimited sale – all while he professes his great and undying life-long love of wild horses. Click Here to access archived shows and then select Wednesday, August 26, 2009 to watch these Wild Horse and Burro “Advisors” in action!


ROUND UPS

California
Wild Burro Removals
BLM announces the removal of wild burros from multiple sites within Southern California. No current documents, NEPA analysis or Decision Record authorizing these removals has yet been found but a BLM response is still pending. Click Here to learn more.


Buckhorn/Carter Reservoir/Coppersmith Herd Management Areas
BLM has signed the Final Decision to remove approximately 650 wild horses from these HMAs. The public has until September 19, 2009 to submit an appeal of BLMs proposal to the Interior Board of Land of Appeals (Please consider ignoring BLMs posted date of September 24, 2009 as IBLA is very strict on the 30 day time limit for appeal submission and it is highly probably that they will throw out a “late appeal” for this reason. There is no public recourse if BLM lies about the submission date). Click Here to learn more.

Nevada
Tobin Herd Management Area & Sonoma Herd Area
Remove approximately 440 wild horses in October 2009 with 22-42 wild horses allowed to remain. Public comments accepted through Friday, September 18, 2009. Click Here to learn more.


Wyoming
Red Desert Complex (Lost Creek, Stewart Creek, Green Mountain, Crooks Mountain and Antelope Hills Herd Management Areas)
Approximately 700 wild horses are being planned for removals. Public comments will be accepted through October 1, 2009. Click Here to learn more.


Idaho
Sands Basin and Four Mile Herd Management Areas
Approximately 206 wild horses will be removed between October 6th thru October 13th. The Decision Record has already been signed so the only available option left for public involvement is to appeal the decision. However, while there is a brief notice describing the round up, there are no posted documents such as an EA, Decision Record or instructions on how to appeal currently available online. Click Here to learn more.


Oregon
Beaty Butte Herd Management Area
Authorizes current removals of approximately 320 wild horses. Also authorizes future removals, administering fertility control and gelding stallions “as needed” during the life of the plan. On a bright note, BLM has rescinded their original decision issued on August 19, 2009, which granted them a 10-year “contract” to do whatever they needed to do without further public notice or involvement. While BLMs revised “Dear Reader Letter” states that the NEW EA is provided via an online link, turns out the link is broken. Big surprise, heh? Since the Decision Record has been signed, the public’s only option is to appeal the decision, despite no public access to the “revised” long-term plan or instructions on how to appeal BLMs decision if we found something in the new management plan we wanted to appeal. Appeals will be accepted until October 2, 2009. Click Here to watch Oregon’s BLM block public access, public involvement and the promised “change” of government transparency (NOT!) as they have authorized “something” regarding the Beaty Butte wild horses, but only they know what it actually is.

Montana
Pryor Mountain Wild Horses
If anyone wants to take a good, hard look at BLM round ups, obstructionism and how BLM isn’t even interested in listening to Congressional Representative Grijalva’s demands for accountability (much less the general public), check out The Cloud Foundations website, which now includes a new blog to inform the public of the harsh realities facing us regarding the continued unchecked "management" of our fast disappearing wild horse and burro herds and their home ranges. TCF is also calling for continued public pressure to have BLM return now removed Pryor Mountain wild horses back to their lawful range. Click Here to learn more.

To view Congressional Representative Grijalva's ignored letter demanding BLM stop the round up of the Pryor Mountain wild horses as well as issuing a "cease and desist" for all future round ups across the West until BLM finally coughs up some sincere answers, Click Here.
RAHALL & GRIJALVA ASK FOR ANSWERS!

www.wildhorsesneedyou.com

Followers